Velou builds AI data infrastructure for the retail AI boom
Velou, which sells AI-powered self-optimizing product catalogs, raises $5M and adds Gavin Hewitt as COO

.png)
Most ecommerce teams think of Google Shopping as a bidding problem. ROAS underperforms? Adjust the bids. CPC too high? Tweak the audience targeting. Impression share dropping? Raise the budget. These instincts are understandable — but they are often treating the symptom rather than the cause. In a significant proportion of underperforming Google Shopping accounts, the root cause is product data quality — and the single most impactful data quality problem is sparse, thin, or imprecise product descriptions.
.png)
Your product is live on Amazon. It has competitive pricing, decent reviews, and an active Sponsored Products campaign. But organic sessions have dropped sharply. Sales are thin. Your ads are running but clicks are low. You check the listing and everything looks normal. What you have not checked — and should have — is your Amazon listing quality score. Your product may be suppressed from organic search entirely.
.png)
You ran a product data enrichment project 12 months ago. Titles were optimized, attributes were filled in, descriptions were rewritten. Performance improved. Then, slowly, it didn't. Traffic dipped a little. ROAS softened. Amazon rank on a few key products quietly slipped. Nothing dramatic — just a persistent, creeping underperformance that nobody could quite explain.
.png)
You've done the work. The products are live, the photography is good, the prices are competitive. But when shoppers search on your website — or in Google — certain products simply don't appear. You check your analytics. Traffic is low but not zero. The SEO team says the pages are indexed. Nothing obvious is broken. So what's going wrong?
.png)
Every ecommerce team knows, in theory, that product data quality affects performance. What almost no team has done is calculate how much poor product data is actually costing them — in specific, quantifiable terms across each of the channels where the cost shows up. This article does that calculation. Not in abstract percentages, but with the mechanisms explained clearly enough to build your own business case.
.png)
"Product data enrichment" and "product data quality" are used interchangeably in most ecommerce conversations. They are not the same thing. Conflating them leads to misaligned investment decisions — teams that think they have an enrichment program when they have a quality monitoring program, and teams that think quality audits are enrichment when they are not. The distinction is simple but consequential.
.png)
Most ecommerce teams have done some version of product data enrichment. They've written better product descriptions, fixed a batch of Merchant Center errors, or pushed the team to fill in missing attributes before a big launch. But sustained, systematic enrichment — the kind that compounds into a genuine performance advantage — is rare. The reason is not effort. It's a set of recurring mistakes that are deeply embedded in how teams think about and resource the work.
.png)
Your product is only as discoverable as the data describing it. That sentence sounds obvious. But most ecommerce teams treat it as a content problem when it is actually a data architecture problem — and the difference between those two framings determines whether enrichment gets treated as a creative task or a commercial infrastructure investment.

.png)
.png)







%20(1).png)


.png)
.png)

.png)



.png)
